Articles about the dangers of internet dating Chatting webcam usa
No gourmet meals, no vacations, no sports, no music, no literature, no art ...
I think that everyone will grant, without argument or proof, that maximizing population does not maximize goods. In reaching this conclusion I have made the usual assumption that it is the acquisition of energy that is the problem.
I can win only by giving a radical meaning to the word "win." I can hit my opponent over the head; or I can drug him; or I can falsify the records.
Every way in which I "win" involves, in some sense, an abandonment of the game, as we intuitively understand it.
It is fair to say that most people who anguish over the population problem are trying to find a way to avoid the evils of overpopulation without relinquishing any of the privileges they now enjoy.
They think that farming the seas or developing new strains of wheat will solve the problem--technologically.
I try to show here that the solution they seek cannot be found.
The population problem cannot be solved in a technical way, any more than can the problem of winning the game of tick-tack-toe.
Put another way, there is no "technical solution" to the problem.
If the great powers continue to look for solutions in the area of science and technology only, the result will be to worsen the situation." I would like to focus your attention not on the subject of the article (national security in a nuclear world) but on the kind of conclusion they reached, namely that there is no technical solution to the problem.
An implicit and almost universal assumption of discussions published in professional and semipopular scientific journals is that the problem under discussion has a technical solution.
But, in terms of the practical problems that we must face in the next few generations with the foreseeable technology, it is clear that we will greatly increase human misery if we do not, during the immediate future, assume that the world available to the terrestrial human population is finite. A finite world can support only a finite population; therefore, population growth must eventually equal zero.
(The case of perpetual wide fluctuations above and below zero is a trivial variant that need not be discussed.) When this condition is met, what will be the situation of mankind? It is not mathematically possible to maximize for two (or more) variables at the same time.
Search for articles about the dangers of internet dating:
My thesis is that the "population problem," as conventionally conceived, is a member of this class.